May 21, 2008

Effect of Court ruling on LB701

What are the consequences of the District Court ruling parts of LB701 unconstitutional? In the short term – not much.

The State has already loaned the NRDs the money to pay for the 2007 water purchase, with repayment due when the Court approves the law.

The NRDs have no water purchases in mind nor any public augmentation plans in place for 2008. As a result, there is no immediate need for money. Because of the large rains in 2007, the State expects that it will be in compliance for 2008, even if it doesn’t do anything. That happens because the rains of 2007 will not be credited to Nebraska until the water is released from the reservoirs in 2008.

Continue reading "Effect of Court ruling on LB701" »

May 20, 2008

LB 701 Unconstitutional

On May 20, Judge Merritt ruled LB 701 unconstitutional. He ruled that the provision that caused the tax to apply only to three of the Republican River Basin NRDs violated the closed class section of the Nebraska Constitution. He also imposed an injunction on the collection of the property tax portion of the bill. The occupational tax, which is the bulk of the money, remains in place.

There were three primary questions the Court addressed.

The first dealt with - is the tax a State obligation that the State should fund and not the tax payers of the Republican River Basin? The Court ruled that it was acceptable to place the tax on the property tax payers of the Basin because it was of primary benefit to the local people while at the same time it happened to help the State in its obligation.
The second dealt with - is the transfer of tax obligation from the State to the local district legal? The Court ruled that it is legal.

The third dealt with - is the limit on who can be taxed constitutional? The tax was only placed on the property tax payers and the irrigated land of three NRDs to the exclusion of all others. The Court ruled that this was unconstitutional as it unfairly targeted one segment of the population.

The Court has ruled that the tax on the irrigated land is acceptable but any tax on non-irrigated property in the Basin is not acceptable.

Court Order

PDF File

May 18, 2008

Arbitration Process

Kansas has initiated the legal procedures as allowed under the Final Settlement Agreement. These procedures are outlined in Section VII of the Final Settlement.

An arbitrator will be chosen by CDR Associates of Boulder. One of the CDR associates is Jonathan Bartsch, who currently acts as facilitator for the Nebraska Water Policy Task Force.

Continue reading "Arbitration Process" »

April 23, 2008

Kansas Demands

On April 22, 2008, Kansas sent a letter to Nebraska detailing what it felt the damages should be for Nebraska's overuse. This was an estimate that Nebraska requested that Kansas make.

Cover Letter

Attachment 1 - Estimated Cost of Compliance

Attachment 2 - Analysis of Measures Required for Compliance

Attachment 3 - Analysis of Shutdown Effects

The $72 million that Kansas is requesting covers the damages caused by Nebraska being out of compliance in 2005 and 2006. It does not include the costs Kansas will estimate at a later date for the 2007 overage or the 2003-2007 overages.

Contact Information

WaterClaim

PO Box 698

Imperial, NE 69033

308 882 3020

info@waterclaim.org

Spam Catcher

Subscribe

Membership Form in MS Word

(What does this mean?)

Alerts Signup

Subscribe to Email Alerts

Watershed Protector





Copyright



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License.